Prior to 1968 a person was declared dead only after their breathing and heart stopped for a determinate period of time.
The current terminology "Brain Death" was unheard of.
When surgeons realized they had the capability of taking organs from
one seemingly “close to death” person and implanting them into another
person to keep the recipient alive longer, a "Pandora’s Box" was opened.
In the beginning, through trial and error, they discovered it was not possible to perform this "miraculous" surgery
with organs taken from someone truly dead, even if the donor was
without circulation for merely a few minutes, because organ damage
occurs within a very brief time after circulation stops.
To justify their experimental procedures it was necessary for them to come up with a solution which is how the term "Brain Death" was contrived.
Much is being done to get your organs.
For an organ to be suitable for transplantation it must be healthy and it must come from a living person.
Once DBD (Donation After Brain Death) or DCD (Donation After Cardiac
Death) has been verified and permission extracted from distraught family
members (in cases where relatives cannot be located the government
often now makes the determination on our behalf) the "organ donor"
undergoes hours, sometimes days, of torturous treatment utilized to
protect and preserve the body-container of "spare parts!"
The
"organ donor" is forced to endure the excruciating painful and ongoing
chemical treatment in preparation for organ excising.
Literally
the "donor" is now an organ warehouse and used for the sole purpose of
organ preservation until a compatible recipient can be located.
Donation after circulatory death (DCD) can be performed on
neurologically intact donors who do not fulfil neurological or brain
death criteria before circulatory arrest. This commentary focuses on the
most controversial donor-related issues anticipated from mandatory
implementation of DCD for imminent or cardiac death in hospitals across the USA.
The truth of the horrific treatment and DEATH OF THE "DONOR"
Organ removal is performed while the patient is given only a paralysing agent but no anaesthetic!
Multi-organ excision, on the average, takes three to four hours of
operating during which time the heart is beating, the blood pressure is
normal and respiration is occurring albeit the patient is on a
ventilator. Each organ is cut out until finally the beating heart is
stopped, a moment before removal.
It is well documented the heart
rate and blood pressure go up when the incision is made. This is the
very response the anaesthesiologist often observes in everyday surgery
when the anaesthetic is insufficient. But, as stated below, organ donors
are not anaesthetised.
There are growing numbers of protesters among nurses and anaesthesiologists,
who react strongly to the movements of the supposed "corpse." These
movements are sometimes so violent it makes it impossible to continue
the taking of organs. Resulting from their personal experiences and
attestations, many in the medical profession have removed themselves
from this program altogether.
New York hospitals are routinely 'harvesting' organs from patients before they're even dead, an explosive lawsuit is claiming.
The suit accuses transplant non-profit The New York Organ Donor Network
of bullying doctors into declaring patients brain dead when they are
still alive.
Plaintiff, Patrick McMahon, 50, reckons one in five patients are showing signs of brain activity when surgeons declare them dead and start hacking out their body parts.
'They're playing God,' said McMahon, a former transplant coordinator
who claims he was fired just four months into the role for speaking out
about the practice.
He said that the donor network makes 'millions
and millions' from selling the organs they obtain to hospitals and to
insurance companies for transplants.
'Hearts, lungs, kidneys, joints, bones, skin grafts, intestines, valves, eyes -- it's all big money.'
The Air Force Combat veteran and former nurse added that financially
strained hospitals are easily influenced to declare a patient brain dead
because they're keen to free up bed space.
The lawsuit, filed in
Manhattan Supreme Court in 2012, cites a 19-year-old car crash victim
who was still struggling to breathe and showing signs of brain activity
when doctors gave the green light for his organs to be harvested.
Network officials including director Michael Goldstein allegedly bullied
Nassau University Medical Centre staff into declaring the teen dead,
stating during a conference call: 'This kid is dead, you got that?'
But McMahon said he believed the 19-year-old could have recovered.
The lawsuit cites three other examples of patients who were still
clinging to life when doctors gave a 'note' - an official declaration by
a hospital that a patient is brain dead, which, as well as consent from
next of kin, is required before a transplant can take place.
The suit claims that a man was admitted to Kings County Hospital in Brooklyn, a month later, again showing brain activity.
It claims McMahon protested but was blown off by hospital and donor
network staff, and the man was declared brain dead and his organs
harvested.
In November 2011, a woman admitted to Staten Island
University Hospital after a drug overdose was declared brain dead and
her organs were about to be harvested when McMahon noticed that she was
being given 'a paralysing aesthetic' because her body was still
jerking.
'She was having brain function when they were cutting into her on the table,' McMahon told MailOnline.
'He had given her a paralyser and there's no reason to give someone who is dead a paralyser.'
He said he confronted the person who gave it to her and he was speechless.
'Finally he said he was told to do it because while they were cutting her chest open she was moving her chest around.
And a paralyser only paralyses you, it does nothing for the pain,' he said.
McMahon added that surgeons 'took everything' with regards to body parts.
'They took her eyes, her joints. She was right there when I was having
the conversation. They were inserting the plastic bones where the real
ones had been.'
According to the lawsuit, when McMahon probed
further on the disturbing case another network employee told hospital
staff he was 'an untrained troublemaker with a history of raising
frivolous issues and questions.'
McMahon added that staff members who collect the most organs throughout the year qualify for a Christmas bonus.
'If counsellors do well by getting a lot of organs they are given a bonus in December,' he said.
The veteran - who worked at the donor network between July and November
- said there are about 30-40 staff who are out in the field, going to
hospitals and trying to get signatures and donations.
Estimated U.S. Average Billed Charges Per Transplant: Heart $1,000,000 Double Lung: $800,000 Liver: $580,000 Kidney: $275,000
More than 123,000 people are on waiting lists for organ transplants in
the United States, 100,000 of whom are waiting for new kidneys. Yet the
need for healthy organs far outpaces donations. Only 28,000 transplants
were completed in the last year, according to the 2014 national data
from the U.S. Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network.
Because organ donors are often alive when their organs are harvested, the #medical
community should not require donors to be declared dead, but instead
adopt more “honest” moral criteria that allow the harvesting of organs
from “dying” or “severely injured” patients, with proper consent, three
leading experts have argued.
This approach, they say, would avoid
the “pseudo-objective” claim that a donor is “really dead,” which is
often based upon purely ideological definitions of death designed to
expand the organ donor pool, and would allow organ harvesters to be more
honest with the public, as well as ensure that donors don’t feel pain
during the harvesting process.
The chilling comments were offered by #Doctor
Neil Lazar, director of the medical-surgical intensive care unit at
Toronto General Hospital, Dr. Maxwell J. Smith of the University of
Toronto, and David Rodriguez-Arias of Universidad del Pais Vasco in
Spain, at a U.S. bioethics conference in October and published in a
recent paper in the American Journal of Bioethics.
“Because there is
a general assumption that dead individuals cannot be harmed, veneration
of the dead-donor rule is dangerously misleading,” they write.
“Ultimately, what is important for the protection and respect of
potential donors is not to have a death certificate signed, but rather
to be certain they are beyond suffering and to guarantee that their
autonomy is respected.”
Instead of the so-called Dead Donor Rule
(DDR), the authors propose that donors should be “protected from harm”
(i.e given anaesthesia so that they cannot feel pain during the donation
process), that informed consent should be obtained, and that society
should be “fully informed of the inherently debatable nature of any
criterion to declare death.”
The doctors note that developing the
criteria for so-called “brain death,” which is often used by doctors to
declare death before organ donation, was an “ideological strategy”
aimed at increasing the donor pool that has been found to be
“empirically and theoretically flawed.” They also criticize the latest
attempts to create new, even looser definitions of death, such as
circulatory death, which they argue amount to simply “pretending” that
the patient is dead in order to get his organs.
Based on an
interview in 2013 with Dr. Paul Byrne, 80-year-old neonatologist blowing
the whistle on the dark side of hospitals, it became clear that the
concept of "brain death" is a complete fabrication conjured up for the
sole purpose of legitimizing the murder of living people in order to
harvest their organs.
These people (who often end up in hospitals
as a result of car accidents or drug overdoses or the like) are given
paralysis drugs during organ removal -- BUT NO ANAESTHESIA!!!
Medical staff are literally cleaving open the chests of these innocent
people and tearing out their organs, one by one, leaving the heart for
last, after which point they are, of course, dead.
It's wakey wakey time people.This is no joke.
If you do not want to be tortured to death by medical sadists, SAY NO TO ORGAN DONATION!
Evil is still evil by any other name.
Src:https://www.facebook.com/1374568786202451/photos/a.1374596532866343.1073741828.1374568786202451/1492324527760209/?type=3
More News on: http://www.theillusionofscience.org/418692745
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17020597 http://www.srtr.org/annual_Reports/2011/113a_dh.aspx http://www.cdc.gov/transplantsaf…/outbreak-invest/index.html http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23990679 http://www.everydayhealth.com/…/donating-kidney-may-carry-…/ http://www.srtr.org/csr/current/Centers/Default.aspx
No comments:
Post a Comment